Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Was the MT for public consumption?
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 13:58:15 -0600
it's not discussion of theology, despite your failed attempt to make it so.
wrong again.
regards,
fred burlingame
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 1:10 PM, K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com> wrote:
> Fred:
>
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 7:27 AM, fred burlingame
> <tensorpath AT gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> facts vs. faith ...
>>
>
> How many times have we asked you not to discuss theology?
>
>>
>> we have complete:
>>
>> a. a 5th century greek manuscript;
>>
>> b. a 10th century hebrew manuscript; and
>>
>> c. a 15th century aramaic mansucript,
>>
>> of the same story.
>>
>> the rest is faith.
>>
>
> We know what the evidence is, and for this group have agreed to work within
> the parameters of that evidence. And one of the things we have agreed to is
> not to talk theology. So can you please knock off the theology?
>
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> fred burlingame
>>
>> Karl W. Randolph.
>