Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Was the MT for public consumption?
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:27:16 -0600
facts vs. faith ...
we have complete:
a. a 5th century greek manuscript;
b. a 10th century hebrew manuscript; and
c. a 15th century aramaic mansucript,
of the same story.
the rest is faith.
regards,
fred burlingame
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 8:58 AM, David P Donnelly
<davedonnelly1 AT juno.com>wrote:
> K Randolph kwrandolph at gmail.com
> Fri Dec 24 08:06:48 EST 2010 wrote:
>
> "The Leningrad Codex is merely a preservation of a document that was
> written
> mostly during that period, with additional marks to aid the non-scholar
> in
> its reading."
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Isn't the text of the Leningrad Codex believed to be an accurate
> representation of the pronunciation of a
> much earlier "Unpointed Hebrew Text" as it was preserved in a Jewish
> Oral Tradition?
>
> Or did an earlier version of a Masoretic Text accomplish the preservation
> of the pronunciation of the "Unpointed Hebrew Text"?
>
> It was my impression that every variant of YHWH found in Codex L. that is
> now rendered as "Adonai", and that every variant of YHWH found in Codex
> L. that is now rendered as "Elohim", was pointed as it is today, because
> of information found in a preserved oral tradition of how the Jewish
> people pronounced the "Unpointed Hebrew Text of their day.
>
> Don't the consonants that occur in the Leningrad Codex almost match
> perfectly with those consonants found in the dead sea scrolls?
>
>
> Dave Donnelly
> ____________________________________________________________
> Mortgage Rates Hit 2.99%
> If you owe under $729k you probably qualify for Gov't Refi Programs
>http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4d14b56e3d088151b8st04duc
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
>http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>