There is no evidence that even encourages us to "accept that the language of
Adam was Hebrew"; the second half of your question is therefore equally
baseless.
Peace.
Fred
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Doug Belot <dbelot AT bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> If we accept that the language of Adam was Hebrew , would that not mean
> that all languages would have a base of hebrew
>
> doug belot
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Kimball" <
> transcriber AT tanach.us>
> To: "b-hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
> Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 3:11 AM
>
> Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] cognate alphabet
>
>
>
>> Is Greek usually considered a cognate language of Hebrew?
>>
>> Chris Kimball
>> West Redding, CT
>> USA
>> _______________________________________________
>> b-hebrew mailing list
>> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.869 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3275 - Release Date: 11/24/10
> 05:34:00
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
>http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>
--
--)---------------
"We are not yet what we already are" (J. Pieper).
Frederic Clarke Putnam, Ph.D. | Professor of Biblical Studies
Philadelphia Biblical University | 200 Manor Avenue | Langhorne, PA
19047-2990 http://pbu.edu | 1215-702-4502 | Fax: 1-215-702-4533 | www.fredputnam.org