Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Could preposition be a morphological part?
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:52:56 -0800
On 26 Feb 2010 at 0:27, Vadim Cherny wrote:
> In weqatal, waw must be a preposition. The prefix would have turned
> the word into wiqtal, like niphal.
> But prepositions don't change the verb's morphology and cannot turn
> it
> from past tense into imperfect.
>
> Am I missing something?
>
> Vadim Cherny