Thank you for your response, and there are many interestingRandall
texts worthy of discussion, and even some questionable
English translations, but it doesn't not deal with
the original question and spins away.
both the state expressed by the participle and bySo, both in
the WAYYIQTOL R intersects E after the beginning
and before the end. So how can this WAYYIQTOL be
perfective?>>
You, not me, claimed that this Gen 41 cannot be
perfective. So you need to explain how it is different from
perfective `amad examples that look similar.
See the original post in this thread.
How can, e.g., 2Chr 20:20, 2 Samuel 20:11, and 12,
2 Ki 2:7 be perfective, but Gen 41 cannot be perfective?
Then we can deal with vayyomer.
braxot
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.