"14. Therefore, the Lord, of His own, shall give you a sign; behold, the young woman is with child, and she shall bear a son, and she shall call his name Immanuel."
" הָרָה " = "is pregnant" This is the perfect tense.
You can once again do "Does not necessarily", "it could" as even The Rashi
takes it here as imperfect (I think because of the prophecy connection) but for your benefit and Karl's
if we go by examples in the Hebrew Bible, this construction is usually the perfect. So now, regarding the offending word in 7:14, we have the nearby Textual Markers of:
HNH = Here is
HRH = Is pregnant
All completely consistent with a young woman who is not only known to Isaiah and Ahaz but physically present.
The HRH could even be physically noticeable (this would fit the larger context of a "forced" prophecy.
You would agree that it's forced on Ahaz. That may not be the limit of it's forcefulness). Consider that the two nearest Textual Markers support a physical presence Harold, your indefinite translation is looking merely like a possible one at this point.
One that could not possibly be likely, even in your opinion, as to this point you always have to use minority meanings. You need a miracle in the larger context to Save your meaning.
"HNH does not have to imply anything about physical presence. In the verse HNH is drawing attention to what a/the virgin will do, not to the presence of the virgin."
HRH is a very physical sign and a very common one in the Hebrew Bible as evidence of
God's mysterious power and presence in human affairs (so to speak).
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.