If you don't like Gesenius, I will give you the same information from
Waltke-O'Connor, Biblical Hebrew Syntax (1990) #15.5.1e, quoting:
The article may also mark nouns definite in the imagination, designating either a particular person or thing necessarily understood to be present or vividly portraying someone or something whose identity is not
otherwise indicated . . . . In some cases the proper English rendering is indefinite:
Gen 18:7 He gave (it) to _a servant_.
JW:
Yes, looking for examples in the Hebrew Bible is excellent evidence for meaning. Regarding Genesis 18:7 though a better question than how the Hebrew definite article was translated is how it should have been translated. For reference purposes:
(_http://www.scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/OTpdf/gen18.pdf_ (http://www.scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/OTpdf/gen18.pdf) ) _http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt0118.htm_ (http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt0118.htm) ז וְאֶל-הַבָּקָר, רָץ אַבְרָהָם; וַיִּקַּח בֶּן-בָּקָר
רַךְ וָטוֹב, וַיִּתֵּן אֶל-הַנַּעַר, וַיְמַהֵר, לַעֲשׂוֹת אֹתוֹ. 7 And Abraham ran unto the herd, and fetched a calf tender and good, and gave it unto the servant; and he hastened to dress it.
This wasn't just any old lad, was it? It was Abraham's servant. The Definite article is what makes that clear. Once again, it sounds okay either way in English so I don't see an Indefinite translation forced or even preferred here.
Since we all agree that the Hebrew definite article for the most part, serves the same purpose as the English definite article, I'm still looking for really good multiple examples of Hebrew usage that would clearly have an Indefinite English translation in order to support an Indefinite English translation for 7:14. This is all before we look at the surrounding Specific context of 7:14.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.