On 3/5/07, Pere Porta wrote:
> I read in an electronic search program (BW) that such a word as YUQAX (Gn
> 18:4) is a passive Qal form. In the same program I read that YUQAM (Gn 4:24)
> is a Hoph'al form.
>
> Vowel and dagesh structure is the same for both.
>
> Then do you think this division (Qal passive <> Hoph'al) is right for the
> brought two cases?
> What is really Qal passive? Beside the participle (Katub), are there for
> this Qal passive conjugation all the normal forms or persons, tenses, etc.?
> Is it used in the normal Perfect tense and, if yes, are there some samples
> thereof in the Bible?
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.