Hi Rolf,
You assert that "an aspectual explanation on the basis of the
relationship between event time and reference time can solve everything".
An observation: You, Rogland, and Cook all provide analyses making use
of "speech time", "event time", and "reference time", yet you all arrive
at vastly different conclusions. So an "explanation on the basis of the
relationship between event time and reference time" may not necessarily
"solve everything". I feel that since you all differ that there may
still be some sort of (subjective?) interpretation of the data which
leads to your respective differing positions.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.