>> But once you come to the realization that a shwa represents the lack
>> of a vowel --- no more, no less --- everything because eaiser and more
>> sensible.
>
>What vowel is lacked in nizcar? Interconsonantal schwa represents not a
What do you mean, "what vowel is lack[ing]"? There is no vowel.
That's what lacking means. (It's like the absurd question in _Catch
22_ about someone who never did something. He is asked WHEN he didn't
do it. He is forced to answer that he always didn't do it....)