No it does not. 'ADAM is explicitly marked as the object in this verse with the marker 'ET.
Sure. But et refers to another phrase: God begot the man, pause, [then] he breathed. The formal antecedent to "breathed" is the man, though we cannot exclude that it was God. ...
No, this is a rule that I am sure of, that in a chain of WAYYIQTOLs with no explicit subject on a following clause the assumed subject is the subject rather than the object of the preceding clause.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.