I still got no reply. Guess no one here could explain why do you discussThe form IAW is just one of many different attested Greek forms of the Name. It deserves no more specific attention than the others. But it clearly corresponds to the first part of the names starting Jeho-, since sheva was often represented by alpha and Greek has no "h".
vocalization of the Tetragrammaton, though it is clearly and widely attested
by ancients as Iao. Doesn't seem to me like a standard of honest scholarship:
you simply disregard hard evidence when it doesn't fit your preconceptions.
Iao cannot be a verb, so forget Iao. That kind of reasoning?
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.