... In any case, I have consistently argued for a
"qamats" under the y of yhwh, but you have downgraded it to a patah and then
apparently argued that it could have been a schwa that was mistaken by
Babylonians
for a patah. You have also seemed to compared "Jehu"' to names beginning with
schwa despite the fact that Jehu has a tsere - a long vowel generally
transliterated as
"ae" and schwa is very very short.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.