We don't have the same view of biblical origins.
There is no point in discussing this.
I just want to call attention to the fact that one's suppositions
color one's translations. People think they are being objective,
but when they turn perfective voice into imperfective out of a
desire to see the text as prophetic, then what can I say?
It is eisegesis, not exegesis.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.