>
The perfective perfect notion was originally built on theDear Rolf,
view that QATAL was past tense and /or signalled completed
acts. Thus, it contradicted fundamental grammatical thoughts
to have hundreds of QATALs with simple future reference. So,
in order to save the grammar
- but without any data - the psychological explanation was
invented that the action was completed in the mind of the
prophet. Please ask your constructor if he or she has any
*data* showing that the QATALs of Isaiah 9:1,5 are not just
simple futures.
What evidence could you possibly bring to show that
these are not just simple narrative pasts?
Liz Fried
A2
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.