Peter:Very good questions! I remember studying XQ and XQH and finding some kind of distinction, at least that for some of the senses of the word(s) only one of the two forms is used. Another important one is CDQ/CDQH. And DG/DGH was discussed on this list not long ago.
In French, there is a pattern of meaning so that a Frenchman knows when to
use soir or soirée, matin or matinée and so forth, is there any such pattern
in Biblical Hebrew?
For some of it, it is the difference between the male and female of an
object, such that PRD and PRDH refer to a male and female donkey, the same
pattern with N(R and N(RH.
For example, what’s the difference between )BR and )BRH, both meaning “wing
feather”? What about )MR and )MRH referring to sayings? XQ and XQH both mean
“statute for setting limits”? NTYB and NTYBH meaning “way, direction one
should go, byway”? There are many other such words. ...
... Has anyone made a study to indicate when one should use a word with aMore very good questions. There is some evidence for choice of gender-based form to fit a chiastic pattern of genders, in poetry. I don't know of any other pattern, or of any general study.
final hey and without? Are we dealing with the masculine referring to the
specific and the feminine to the general? Is there any pattern? Or is this
merely acceptable alternate spellings? ...
... Are some merely a feminine noun written without the hey in the singular?Probably not, except in a few cases of textual corruption. Final he as a mater is never dropped, except in a small set of suffixes -ka, -ta, -ha, -na. Evidence for this, if you could find it, would be feminine agreement for forms without he. Evidence against would be construct forms, as the -t of the feminine construct could never be dropped, as well as plurals in -im.
...
... There are examples much more complex than the ones given above.You could probably get a PhD for it, at least if you discovered some pattern.
Is this a publishable study? ;-)
Karl W. Randolph.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.