Skip to Content.
Please activate JavaScript in your web browser
List archive
Re: Construct + Finite = Relative?
Chronological
Thread
<
Chronological
>
<
Thread
>
From
: Alviero Niccacci <sbfnet AT netvision.net.il>
To
: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Subject
: Re: Construct + Finite = Relative?
Date
: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 10:24:10 +0300
At 1:38 AM +0200 9/19/00, Ian Hutchesson wrote:
< ... >
Dear Ian Hutchesson,
Thanks for your clarification. I think that our respective positions are now sufficently clear to the BH-list members.
Peace and all good.
Alviero Niccacci
--
Studium Biblicum Franciscanum Tel. +972 - 2 - 6282 936
POB 19424 - 91193 - Jerusalem Fax +972 - 2 - 6264 519
Israel
Home Page:
http://www.custodia.org/sbf
Email
mailto:sbfnet AT netvision.net.il
Re: Construct + Finite = Relative?
,
(continued)
Re: Construct + Finite = Relative?
,
Ian Hutchesson, 09/11/2000
Re: Construct + Finite = Relative?
,
Peter Kirk, 09/12/2000
RE: Construct + Finite = Relative?
,
Liz Fried, 09/12/2000
Re: Construct + Finite = Relative?
,
Studium Biblicum Franciscanum, 09/14/2000
RE: Construct + Finite = Relative?
,
Studium Biblicum Franciscanum, 09/14/2000
Re: Construct + Finite = Relative?
,
Studium Biblicum Franciscanum, 09/14/2000
Re: Construct + Finite = Relative?
,
Ian Hutchesson, 09/14/2000
Re: Construct + Finite = Relative?
,
Dave Washburn, 09/15/2000
Re: Construct + Finite = Relative?
,
Alviero Niccacci, 09/18/2000
Re: Construct + Finite = Relative?
,
Ian Hutchesson, 09/18/2000
Re: Construct + Finite = Relative?
,
Alviero Niccacci, 09/20/2000
Archive powered by
MHonArc 2.6.24
.