From: clayton stirling bartholomew <c.s.bartholomew AT worldnet.att.net>
To: Alviero Niccacci <sbfnet AT netvision.net.il>, Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Subject: Re: Construct + Finite = Relative?
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 10:19:02 -0700
on 09/11/00 12:49 AM, Alviero Niccacci wrote:
> In BH both protasis and apodosis show an amazing variety of forms that are
> different grammatically but equivalent syntactically, i.e., they play the
> same
> function. The whole Chapter 8 of my Syntax is devote to this subject.
Alviero,
Is your Syntax organized according to syntactical function or by
morphological categories? If you have produced a Syntax which uses
functional categories to structure your presentation then I would like to
see how you have accomplished this.
Clay
--
Clayton Stirling Bartholomew
Three Tree Point
P.O. Box 255 Seahurst WA 98062