Have you read how Rohl to deals with the falsification (I assume you
mean of his cnronology rather than of the standard one), which is in
his appendix? Rohl is not irrelevant as he attempts to do just what
you ask "one" to do. He may or may not be successful, you have no way
to tell until you READ THE MATERIAL!!!
Peter
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re[3]: FW: Just a clarification
Author: <MC2499 AT mclink.it> at Internet
Date: 15/02/2000 19:18
>
> Read Rohl's appendix where he addresses this evidence.
Sorry, Rohl's is just plain irrelevant until one can deal with the
falsification
of the standard chronology...