Read Rohl's appendix where he addresses this evidence.
Peter Kirk
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: FW: Just a clarification
Author: <npl AT teol.ku.dk> at Internet
Date: 14/02/2000 18:04
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Kirk [SMTP:peter_kirk AT sil.org]
> Sent: Monday, 14 February, 2000 18:28
> To: Biblical Hebrew
> Cc: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
> Subject: Re: FW: Just a clarification
>
> There are two reasons why I am avoiding discussion of the Assyrian
> chronological evidence:
>
> 1) It is not directly relevant to the part of Rohl's thesis which I
> have presented, which is largely independent of absolute dating;
>
But it is extremely important in this connection and it formed one
of the bases of the reconstruction of the chronology of the ancient Near
East when it started. By disregarding the synchronisms Rohl is simply
sidesteppinmg instead of addressing the most important kind of evidence we
possess.
NPL