Skip to Content.
Please activate JavaScript in your web browser
List archive
Re: vav conversive
Chronological
Thread
<
Chronological
>
<
Thread
>
From
: Jim West <jwest AT highland.net>
To
: Joseph Brian Tucker <music AT riverviewcog.org>
Cc
: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
Subject
: Re: vav conversive
Date
: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 15:45:09 -0400
At 03:15 PM 9/1/99 +0000, you wrote:
>
1. Where did the tetra in tetragrammaton come from? Just the Greek?
yup. Its not a Hebrew word.
>
>
2. If there was a miscontruing of the divine name, why was there not a
>
misconstruing of elohim?
because the divine name is yahweh- and elohim is a title, not a name.
>
>
3. What constitutes a word in hebrew?
??? what constitutes a word in any language... ideas expressed verbally.
>
>
4. What is the best way to describe the difference between a root and a
>
stem?
There is no difference. Just like there is no difference between
conjugating and parsing.
Best,
Jim
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Jim West, ThD
email- jwest AT highland.net
web page-
http://web.infoave.net/~jwest
vav conversive
,
Joseph Brian Tucker, 09/01/1999
<Possible follow-up(s)>
Re: vav conversive
,
Jim West, 09/01/1999
Re: vav conversive
,
Dave Washburn, 09/01/1999
Re: vav conversive
,
Paul Zellmer, 09/01/1999
Re: vav conversive
,
Brian Tucker, 09/01/1999
Re: vav conversive
,
Dave Washburn, 09/01/1999
Re[2]: vav conversive
,
peter_kirk, 09/02/1999
Re: Re[2]: vav conversive
,
Dave Washburn, 09/02/1999
Re: vav conversive
,
Bryan Rocine, 09/02/1999
Re[4]: vav conversive
,
peter_kirk, 09/03/1999
Re: Re[4]: vav conversive
,
Dave Washburn, 09/03/1999
Re: vav conversive
,
Brian Tucker, 09/03/1999
Archive powered by
MHonArc 2.6.24
.