Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

typicalgirls - Re: [TypicalGirls] The Young Lady's Post-Punk Handbook

typicalgirls AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Typical Girls: Women in Punk/Post-Punk/Underground Music (Circa 1975-1980s)

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Sharon Cheslow <decomposition AT mindspring.com>
  • To: "Typical Girls: Women in Punk/Post-Punk/Underground Music (Circa 1975-1980s)" <typicalgirls AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [TypicalGirls] The Young Lady's Post-Punk Handbook
  • Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:35:55 -0800

Dina and Mike, you both bring up some really good thoughts. Having been there at the time (although just as an observer in the beginning), it's hard now to explain how different things were for women. Even though the '60s had brought on many positive changes, there were still many rigid and superficial roles that were expected of girls and women. If you attempted to break out of those roles, you were ostracized or teased or called derogatory names.

I can only speak for myself in terms of how these women were perceived or what impact they had, but what I noticed right off the bat with punk, and then with post-punk, was that most of the girls & women involved were subverting stereotypes of females. Yes, a part of that meant androgyny. But it also meant looking at the signifiers of what constituted women in society and women in rock and then turning those things on their heads or doing something playful or shocking with them.

Even though many weren't commercially successful, they had just as much of an influence on the "rock culture at large." For example, Patti Smith didn't have a top 40 hit until Because the Night with Bruce Springsteen in 1978, but she'd already had a huge influence by then (she'd been performing for five years prior). Many rock mags and newspapers wrote about her - she was critically successful before she was commercially successful. Part of the reason she was covered is because she was a rock writer herself, but mostly it's because she was so unique and powerful for that time.

In the US, both Patti Smith and Debbie Harry dealt with this in different ways. Patti wore a tie and embraced her male rock and poetry idols - she made you think about how we define women by the way they dress and act. It caused an uproar when she appeared on the cover of Easter revealing her hairy armpits and led to Gilda Radner's Candy Slice character on SNL which made fun of this. Debbie took the girly-girl stereotype to its extreme and even the band name Blondie was a reference to the dumb blonde stereotype. Yes, she was subverting the girl singer, and she was also parodying the role of the female lead singer with the male backing band. Females were not expected to do anything other than sing in a band. If they were a singer-songwriter, they were allowed to play piano and sing or play acoustic guitar and sing. It was very, very rare for females to play electric instruments or drums until punk and post-punk came along.

In the UK, the Slits and Poly Styrene dealt with this by writing lyrics examining these stereotypes and societal expectations. Siouxsie Sioux, like many other UK punk ladies, bared her breasts in revealing clothes as an act of protest. One of the first widely distributed UK punk photos in the US was of the Bromley Contingent after the Sex Pistols' Bill Grundy TV incident...Siouxsie Sioux and Sue Catwoman were shocking merely by having close cropped hair and extreme make-up! These images were widely distributed in the mainstream media, both print and TV.

In those days, women were expected to be groupies, not to express themselves creatively. That's why the cover of the Slits' Typical Girls record is so amazing. Not only were they liberating themselves from the groupie role by playing their own instruments and writing their own songs, but they represented themselves naked in mud in defiance. As Dina notes, they "felt completely free to express their feminine and masculine and simply human qualities freely." The Slits may not have been widely known in the US at that time, but they were very popular in the UK and were covered regularly by NME and Sounds, both of which were widely available in the US.

Sorry for the long post. I could talk about this forever!!

Sharon




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page