Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.6.1 integration to test

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Bearcat M. Sandor" <sourcemage AT feline-soul.com>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.6.1 integration to test
  • Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:14:15 -0600

George,

I have that same link too. Should i just delete it?

Also i have:

pngconf.h -> libpng12/pngconf.h
png.h -> libpng12/png.h

which are both from libpng.

Bearcat M. Sandor

On Wednesday 19 September 2007 in an email titled "Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc
2.6.1 integration to test" George Sherwood wrote:
>On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:47:51 -0700
>
>"David Brown" <dmlb2000 AT gmail.com> wrote:
>> I was wondering how many people actually installed glibc 2.6.1 and how
>> much testing and rebuilds of their system they've done. I've got both
>> i386 and x86-64 covered all the way with gnome/xfce4 about 550 spells
>> in all and they all work fine. Is this the case with everyone else?
>
>I have built some where over 300 spells since updating to 2.6.1 with no
>problems. My only concern is the issue that both Arwed and I ran into
>with symbolic links in the /usr/include directory. I am not even sure
>where mine came from, but I had a link to /usr/include/asm-generic.
>Glibc 2.6.1 built and installed fine, but I had spells fail due to
>missing includes. There was just a small error during the install that
>didn't cause a failure.
>
>Other then that problem, I think we are good to go to test. It might
>only effect a few people and the cause is very well understood.
>
>George
>
>_______________________________________________
>SM-Discuss mailing list
>SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
>http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page