Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
  • To: Jaka Kranjc <lynx AT mages.ath.cx>
  • Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] opinion for spell removal
  • Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:33:10 -0500

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jaka Kranjc wrote:
> No hits on the ledger. I couldn't find anything either, so I agree with the
> possible removal.

I'm simply going to point out that relying on the ledger to determine
usage of a spell is flawed. That's not an official count or anything. I
don't feel that it should be used as a "Should we do something" proof.

- --
David Kowis
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Cauldron Component Lead |
| SourceMage GNU/Linux -- www.sourcemage.org |
| |
| Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying |
| to find easier ways to do something. - Robert Heinlein |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
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=La73
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page