Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Jeremy Blosser (emrys)" <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16
  • Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:30:01 -0600

On Feb 28, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) [jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org] wrote:
> As far as this particular case, I agree you should have consulted first as

s/should have consulted/should have been consulted/

Why do I always leave out the important words.

> the section maintainer, and if there was disagreement on what to do then at
> least the grimoire team lead should have been engaged as well to help
> figure it out. I don't think Eric was trying to act in a PL capacity in
> doing something like this, one spell's versioning frankly isn't significant
> enough to call for that. Also I think that dependences which are now
> broken are obviously bugs and the person that created them should be
> responsible to see they get fixed.
>
> As a long time e16 user myself, things I would hope are considered while
> you guys figure out if this should stay as one or two spells include:
>
> - Upstream wants to allow people to install both versions at once, ideas on
> how can we support this using just one spell?
>
> - Certain things need to depend on either e16 or e17 and we need a way to
> handle that, again, preferably while allowing both to be installed at
> once.

Attachment: pgpNhUkyo2yEF.pgp
Description: PGP signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page