Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
  • To: SM Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment
  • Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:17:46 -0800 (PST)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Now that the vote is finished I'd like to propose an amendment to our
voting rules[0].

I would like to add a clause specifying that a (valid ;)) GPG signed
e-mail is required for all vote-/nomination-related e-mails. I was
thinking of only requiring this for votes, but then thought that
nominations also require nominations, acceptance, and a second, which
we'd also want to verify, and then you may also want the nomination
and vote requests themselves signed along with the results, just in
case an imposter me comes along. ;)

All 'valid' keys are those listed on:
http://www.sourcemage.org/keysigning (which I'll be moving from
http://wiki.sourcemage.org/smgl-keysigning since we don't want just
anyone modifying GPG fingerprints ;)).

Any nays? Thoughts?

- -sandalle

[0] http://www.sourcemage.org/TeamLeadVotingProcess

- --
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDtWu+HXt9dKjv3WERAhgPAKCMFgPdrRn2Ip+k4Xhx4AlVfSs97wCgruA8
vp1Fj5xdyMDdTedDAxdPD9I=
=9HEw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



  • [SM-Discuss] Voting process amendment, Eric Sandall, 12/30/2005

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page