Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] template engines

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Andrew \"ruskie\" Levstik" <ruskie AT mages.ath.cx>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] template engines
  • Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:37:39 +0100

Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote :

> They mostly are designed to produce HTML, but not exclusively, so I'd
> object to putting any such things into http section.
> In reality, template engines are not the worst of it, so the question is
> probably this: what's the difference between `libs' and `devel'
> sections, and how does one determine which one of those two "last
> resorts" to choose if none of the other sections fit?
> And a little sub-question :-): isn't it time for a separate Python
> section? It would be a good place for many a spell from devel, libs,
> http, and maybe others.
>
> Sergey.
>
> Eric Sandall wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> We have smarty in php-pear, clearsilver in devel, cheetah in libs, and
> >> maybe more. What's a good section for template engines?
> >
> >
> > Since those are generally specific to a language I would say keep/put
> > them in the section associated with their 'language' (e.g. php, perl,
> > or http for 'generic').
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
>

I think it would be a good time tostart a separate ruby section as well...
But then the questions comes who will maintain it...

--
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru

Key id = 9A5117F8
Key fingerprint = 6731 FEF2 99A8 4672 5962 69AB 3DAF DA67 9A51 17F8





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page