Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Sorcery] Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [Bug 2129] openssh shouldcreate ssh user

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Ladislav Hagara <hgr AT vabo.cz>
  • To: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
  • Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org, sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery] Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [Bug 2129] openssh shouldcreate ssh user
  • Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 16:15:38 +0100

Thank you.
And why does not sshd have its own group sshd ?
Why group nogroup ?
For example Mandrake uses group sshd too.
- lace -

> This was fixed last night (hmm did I remember to close the bug?). The
> fix is to comment out line 41 of libgrimoire and add the line
> 'nogroup:65534:' to /etc/sorcery/groups.
>
> On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 04:56, Ladislav Hagara wrote:
> > Sorcery team, please, could you modify /etc/sorcery/accounts and
> > /etc/sorcery/groups according to
> > http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2129#c3
> >
> > I installed latest iso http://download.sourcemage.org/iso/ :
> > /etc/sorcery/accounts contains sshd:111:65534
> > /etc/group contains nogroup with 65534
> > /etc/sorcery/groups contains sudo:111:
> >
> > My suggestion:
> > /etc/sorcery/accounts could contains sshd:111:111
> > /etc/sorcery/groups could be modified, I would added group sshd:111:
> > and modify group sudo:111: to for example sudo:114:
> >
> > Why does sshd use nogroup? I think sshd could have its own group sshd.
> > Or modify create_account function to ignore nogroup in /etc/passwd.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page