Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

percy-l - [percy-l] Ernest Becker's 1974 Pulitzer Prize winner: The Denial of Death

percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Percy-L: Literary, Religious, Scientific, and Philosophical Discussion on Walker Percy

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Karey Perkins" <karey AT kareyperkins.com>
  • To: "'Percy-L: Literary and Philosophical Discussion'" <percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: [percy-l] Ernest Becker's 1974 Pulitzer Prize winner: The Denial of Death
  • Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 17:40:31 -0400

Hi Robert, et al-

 

I am off-teaching until September 1 and finally have time to wrap this thing up…  and it needs to be done by then!  So, that’s where I’m completely focused for the next couple of months!  Re: Jaynes, the background of language origins, etc., that is probably less important to what I’m doing – except insofar as it relates to what symbol is, and so, what a human being is.  But I did want to briefly cover them.

 

Now, a more important question for anyone on the list: 

 

Did Percy read Ernest Becker’s Pulitzer Prize winning novel, The Denial of Death?  It is really fantastic.  I think he would have loved it.  Becker is cultural anthropologist who covers so much of what Percy was discussing, though language itself is less central.  But human “symbol-mongering” ability is important.  He uses a lot of Otto Rank, another student of Freud, bypassing Jung for the most part (Percy was a member of the Jungian discussion group) as he considered Jung more esoteric than Rank, and also more prominent and therefore more widely discussed already.  He discusses at length Rank’s interpretation of Kierkegaard.  He mentions Langer too.  Anyway, so many of his ideas/themes are repeated in Percy – but Percy was talking about these things way before Becker, I believe.  Becker just says them so well.  Anyway, his ultimate thesis is (amongst the many points he makes) that the world is terrifying, the inevitability of death haunts us all constantly without our conscious realization, and religion is a psychological necessity to human beings or we become neurotic (or worse). Psychoanalysis fails because it “doesn’t allow a person to find out who he is and why he is here on earth, why he has to die, and how he can make his life a triumph” (Becker, 1997, p. 193).  Beautifully worded.  Whether or not religion has any grounding in actual reality, Becker says, humans must make the Kierkegaardian leap of faith to the transcendent to find real happiness and fulfillment. 

 

Karey

 

 

 

 

 


From: percy-l-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org [mailto:percy-l-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Robert Eckert
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 2:37 PM
To: Percy-L: Literary and Philosophical Discussion
Subject: Re: [percy-l] consciousness, Julian Jaynes, and Percy

 

Jaynes should have entitled his book "The Origin of Selfconsciousness....". Jaynes does not deal with the origin of language, but its development--specifically with the origin of the concept of "I". -- [eye]                           

 

[A related interesting book is "The Alphabet Effect".]

 

Consciousness is the naming of all. Selfconsciousness is the naming of "I".

 

Reread the "Primer" section in LC. The joy of naming of the two-year-old child is replaced by the pain of selfconsciousness of seven-year-old.

 

 

Consciousness is the flashlight that lights the world. Selfconsciousness is the utterly futile attempt by that flashlight to shine on itself.

 

[Adam Smith, of all people, also wrote an interesting essay on language origins.]

 

 

 

How'd the dissertation go?

 


Karey Perkins <karey AT kareyperkins.com> wrote:

I am reading Julian Jaynes’s  The Origin of Consciousness and the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, © 1976, 1990.  He discusses the evolution of language.

 

Questions: 

 

1)  Did Percy read Jaynes?  If so, his opinion?

2)  How might he have responded, in your opinion, if he had read him?

3)  Did Jaynes know of Percy?  He does cite Peirce, ever so briefly, but not Percy, Langer, or Cassirer.

4)  What is the general consensus of the mind-body and/or semiotic community on Jaynes?

5)  Has anyone on the list read Jaynes?

6)  How does Jaynes’ thoughts stand up today? (16 years after last printing)

7)  What do you think of Jaynes?  What is the value of his book/thoughts?

8)  Any other thoughts?

 

I do remember Mike Frentz differentiating between the more scientific approaches to semiotics/consciousness and the more humanistic approaches, with Jaynes in the former camp and Percy in the latter…. I’ve heard this book is an important one –

 

Karey

 

--
An archive of all list discussion is available at https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/percy-l/

Visit the Walker Percy Project at http://www.ibiblio.org/wpercy

 

 


Do you Yahoo!?
Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page