Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - [internetworkers] Re: Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing.

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Lance A. Brown" <lance AT bearcircle.net>
  • To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: [internetworkers] Re: Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing.
  • Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 18:28:16 -0500

Thomas Woods wrote:
This sets up up to recognize marriages of more than two people, as well. If we're going to recognize same sex marriage, what is the purpose of limiting the marriage to two people? I mean, if marriage is going to be redefined, let's be sure anyone who wants to marry anyone else has thier rights protected. Under this rule a whole sorority house could "marry" (whoa guys, calm down ;) to claim medical benefits from one or two members who work.

If they are willing to pay the premiums that would be involved, why would this be bad? Just add "Family + X additional premium Member" to the slate of "Employee", "Employee + One", "Family", etc. insurance options.

--[Lance]

--
Carolina Spirit Quest: http://www.carolinaspiritquest.org/
Celebrate The Circle: http://www.angelfire.com/nc/celebratethecircle/
My LiveJournal: http://www.livejournal.com/users/labrown/




  • [internetworkers] Re: Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing., Lance A. Brown, 03/01/2004

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page