Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - Re: Does this strike you as un-Web-o-cratic?

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "saundrakaerubel.com" <saundrakae AT saundrakaerubel.com>
  • To: "InterNetWorkers" <internetworkers AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: Does this strike you as un-Web-o-cratic?
  • Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 16:18:42 -0500


Hello

Online versions of newspapers, periodicals, dissertations and the like have been around for a price since at least the late 70s when I was using them through Dialog, Lexis-Nexis, Orbit or DJ to access information. Of course they were available to the privileged few that were trained to use some very archaic systems. Or I could have bused it to the local library and looked at them for free. With the Union List of Periodicals, a source that lets you know which libraries have which publications, if I knew the article was only available at Harvard Med, which was frequently the case, getting it from the online service was a LOT cheaper.

With the Internet, this information is now available to the masses, it's called paying for convenience. I am not surprised that some online periodicals/newspapers are now charging. I know that some silicon valley papers already do, but it is their parent company, Knight Ridder that probably made that decision.

Enough of these dot coms going to dot gones. You have to make money
somewhere.

Perhaps that "rich guy in California" is my friend the Venture Capitalist interested in reading about what others are doing in different areas of the country. You want information, you get it any way you can, and sometimes that means paying cash.

Saundra, The Former Librarian


At 02:51 PM 12/28/2000 -0500, "B"ing mobile wrote:
I know that dot-coms are trying to figure out how to make money with
their Web sites, but charging for _links_ to content!?!? What happens to
our ability to say "lookit what I found here, Clyde"?

http://ww.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,40850,00.html

This is another leg in the all-information-as-commodity ramp. The News
and Observer soon will begin charging for the privilege of viewing its
online archive, as a number of other news organizations are doing. (No
charge if you subscribe.) Used to be that the newspapers made their
money through advertising -- roughly 60-65% of a regular paper is ads --
and saw the news-ed parts of their product as the method by which the
advertising was distributed. I certainly haven't noticed fewer ads
online....

I am troubled by this movement toward paying for information online
since it places information in the same cart as exotic fruit.... In a
"free" and "democratic" society, we *must* be informed before we can
make informed decisions. At the least, in the current Real World(tm)
scenario, public libraries provide copies of newspapers that anyone can
walk in and read, free of charge. What happens when/if libraries fade
away and there's no place for folks to find information that they want
or need? Will online libraries be allowed to provide free news archives
that anyone can access? (Somehow I doubt it....)

It seems that, for news organizations, this is yet another step away
from serving the public and toward serving the bottom line. (Does some
rich guy in California _really_ _care_ about what happens in the
Research Triangle, NC? Don't think so, as long as his profits increase.)
Here, I could go off on my favorite rant about how the
mega-corporatization of news organizations is threatening our
liberty....

--
"B"ing mobile
=====================================
I always have more questions
Thank you in advance for your answers
=====================================
http://beeline.home.mindspring.com


---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to internetworkers as: saundrakae AT saundrakaerubel.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page