Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

gmark - RE: Proper Punctuation

gmark AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Kata Markon

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: JFAlward AT aol.com
  • To: gmark AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
  • Subject: RE: Proper Punctuation
  • Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 18:51:45 EDT


In a message dated 10/17/02 2:57:56 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
skelley AT daemen.edu writes:

<< It might be worth remembering that Jeff wrote a conference paper--not a
journal article. He will read it aloud to an audience who will have no idea
where the commas are placed. Given that, isn't this discussion of proper
punctuation a bit of overkill?


JOE ALWARD

I don't think it's overkill as it applies to Goodacre's published paper, but
your point is well-taken--up to a point--about Jeffrey Gibson's conference
paper. If Jeffrey only plans to read his paper, it will sound the same
irrespective of where the commas and periods are. Nevertheless, the
placement of the commas and periods in future papers Gibson will write for
publication in a journal certainly *will* matter, however, so I think it is a
good idea to follow the proper convention.

In believe the editors of American-published journals (such as the JBL ?)
should be encouraged to enforce the American standard, which calls for
periods and commas always to be placed before the closing quotation, whether
the punctuation was part of the quoted material, or not. I also am unclear
at this point whether the currently-accepted style in the United Kingdom is
the same as that advocated by Fowler in his 1908 book, _The King's English_.
The editors of most of the British newspapers and magazines I surveyed online
seemed to be as schizophrenic about the placement as was Goodacre in that
paragraph I cited from his article. It get the impression that the editors
aren't sure what they should do, so they just don't think about it too much.
I don't see that in the American newspapers and magazines, but maybe that's
because I haven't tried too hard to find fault with them. In any case, as
I've said before, it makes sense to me for the British Bible researchers to
follow the convention used in the King James Version of the Bible, and it
certainly seems sensible also for researchers submitting their work to the
JBL (which is believe is published in the United States) to put commas and
periods before the closing quote. And, finally, no matter WHAT rule one
uses, one must use it consistently throughout one's paper, in my opinion,
lest one give the readers the impression that one is indecisive.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page