Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

freetds - Re: [freetds] Question about max size of a dbrpcparam

freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: FreeTDS Development Group

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Navdeep Shergill" <jatshergill AT gmail.com>
  • To: "FreeTDS Development Group" <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [freetds] Question about max size of a dbrpcparam
  • Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 08:18:41 -0700

Thanks for the info James!

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 7:23 AM, James K. Lowden <jklowden AT freetds.org>wrote:

> Navdeep Shergill wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Navdeep Shergill
> > <jatshergill AT gmail.com>wrote:
> > > well.. i set it to 4096 and it worked!!!
> > >
> > > I am amazed. :)
> > >
> > > Now the question is what else will this impact?? Meaning changing the
> > > block size like this..> >
> > > Can someone comment on the blocksize parameter in the freetds.conf
> > > flag? is it safe to change it?
> >
> > Can someone comment on the blocksize parameter in the freetds.conf flag?
> > is it safe to change it?
>
> It's safe. I don't understand why larger blocks work and smaller ones
> don't, and ISTR that we automatically set the blocksize to 4096 on TDS7+
> connections. But I'm glad it works for you. You might have tripped on a
> subtle TCP implementation bug.
>
> --jkl
> _______________________________________________
> FreeTDS mailing list
> FreeTDS AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page