Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

freetds - Re: [freetds] 0.65 (or whatever) TODO

freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: FreeTDS Development Group

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT" <Frediano.Ziglio AT vodafone.com>
  • To: "FreeTDS Development Group" <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [freetds] 0.65 (or whatever) TODO
  • Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:59:10 +0200


>
> > I don't understand... why bsqlodbc have to behave well with Sybase's
> > driver??
>
> It's a way of finding errors. If bsqlodbc behaves one way with with
> Sybase's driver and another way with FreeTDS, it could point
> to a bug.
> Other applications e.g. DBD::ODBC are written to use *any*
> ODBC driver,
> and they sometimes expose bugs, but their complexity makes it hard to
> trace what's going on. bsqlodbc is simple, making it a good debugging
> tool IMHO, but since I don't know ODBC all that well and
> mostly use only
> FreeTDS, I don't know when I'm writing good ODBC compliant
> code and when
> I'm just adapting to FreeTDS's implementation.
>
> Besides, before I tell you we have a bug, I think it's good to check
> another vendor's behavior. ;-)
>
> It would probably be better to test with Microsoft's driver,
> but I'm down
> to zero Window boxes at home and no time for such things at work.
>

Well... all unittests compile under and for (cross speacking) Windows
and all tests shold work flawlessly. Perhaps there's some differences in
some tests due to some strictness... I'll redo a test just to see if
differences are still "acceptable"!

freddy77





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page