cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #1: attribution
- From: Francesco Poli <invernomuto AT paranoici.org>
- To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #1: attribution
- Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 18:57:18 +0200
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:19:58 -0700 Kat Walsh wrote:
> Attribution is required by all of the CC licenses, and in fact it is
> uncommon for any license not to require it (other than those intended
> to be basically equivalent to a public domain dedication).
>
> As an attribution requirement is essential to a compatibility
> candidate, how may the specific requirements differ?
Personally, I think there should be adequate room for differences in
the attribution requirement (if such a requirement is needed at all in
the candidate license). Otherwise it may happen that no license will
ever be considered as Compatible...
I am thinking about the GNU GPL text, for instance, where some form of
attribution is implicitly required, but not in the same manner as
dictated by CC licenses.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgp8QcRsmGUb6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #1: attribution,
Francesco Poli, 05/01/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #1: attribution,
Luis Villa, 05/03/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #1: attribution,
Tyng-Ruey Chuang, 05/05/2014
- Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #1: attribution, Kat Walsh, 05/06/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #1: attribution,
Tyng-Ruey Chuang, 05/05/2014
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Compatibility open issue #1: attribution,
Luis Villa, 05/03/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.