Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: [cc-licenses] Request for feedback: compatibility in BY and BY-NC

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Francesco Poli <invernomuto AT paranoici.org>
  • To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Request for feedback: compatibility in BY and BY-NC
  • Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:52:22 +0100

On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:57:19 -0800 Kat Walsh wrote:

[...]
> We believe this approach, of recognizing compatibility with
> other licenses as permitted so long as the terms of the original CC
> license are respected (and providing adequate guidance outside the
> license) best enables interoperability with material under other
> licenses, while respecting the intentions of licensors.
>
> However, we are open to feedback on whether this language should be changed.

I personally think that recognizing compatibility with other
(permissive) licenses is a good thing to do, as it adds clarity, at
least for people who understand how copyright applies to adaptations.

However, I am strongly convinced that this is not enough to guarantee
compatibility with other (less permissive) licenses.

For instance, please consider a CC-by-v4.0-licensed work.
A recipient could desire to mix it with material licensed under the
terms of a permissive non-copyleft Free Software license, such as the
3-clause BSD license, the Expat license, or the zlib license.
This is currently permitted, as far as I can tell.

But the resulting adaptation will include parts licensed under
CC-by-v4.0, which is GPL-incompatible, unless an explicit one-way
conversion clause is added to it.
Hence, the adaptation will turn out to be GPL-incompatible, despite all
the above cited permissive non-copyleft are perfectly GPL-compatible.

I think that this obstacle to material reuse should be removed.
This goal would be partly achieved by adding an explicit one-way
conversion-to-GPLv2-or-later clause to CC-by-v4.0.

But the most natural and general way to cure the problem would be to
add an explicit one-way conversion-to-zlib clause to CC-by-v4.0,
as I have already suggested in
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/cc-licenses/2013-February/007328.html

I hope this may be implemented in the next draft of CC-by-v4.0.



--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE

Attachment: pgpYMB0sR9vem.pgp
Description: PGP signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page