Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: [cc-licenses] Thoughts on NC

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: jonathon <jonathon.blake AT gmail.com>
  • To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Thoughts on NC
  • Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:28:56 +0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/04/12 05:57, Gisle Hannemyr wrote:

> by the CC makes no difference (i.e. even works with a "noncommercial"
> clause makes the PRO or CS unable to collect and therefore unable to
> pass on rolyalties to the artist).

Please explain how a license that does not give up collection society
rights, when they are mandatory, prevents the PRO or CS from
distributing the royalties that they collected for use of that content.

> while at the same time making sure that artists are getting paid through
collective or statutory licensing arrangements.

That statement must have been meant as a joke.

The CSs and PROs are almost as good at stealing artist's income as the
record labels are.

jonathon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPjahNAAoJEFD/SeNs/huZXEYIAJTyy3DMwxFjEY7dfgHOpB40
2SZuNdsuENaRSuIImWQ9cqlW6pac/yele7leINDu7yq9lIziqPCnHS1GlP++a0Lg
tDShHDVxtsM8Dy5Hk2uC/WkLGm9TTNtUoqlLL+ttOZuULmin4tARvX2Qxt5QCqHa
ETFJdwOIuFVOLkz1aO2nELiMSu48lcX8nEmopDJh2maf6vH9BcyKHZl7onDQHNSy
7WNbWLrdtQJL+bhP2MgtiR+I9k8hKYA4Yotx7TL2VEjshBA7kPjAOjL0HGgWgqJ6
TzWhiVJNRreSiDXrwAnqlGJzWroOVIBpRDeMVCPXM9YYOwJvzFNvCzB24YLfagM=
=VvY6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page