Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: [cc-licenses] ShareAlike: no porting, please, GPL-compatibility instead

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Diane Peters <diane AT creativecommons.org>
  • To: Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] ShareAlike: no porting, please, GPL-compatibility instead
  • Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 20:12:06 -0700

Wrong link, sorry about that.  Here's the schedule, with the porting consultation slated to take place once we are farther along:  http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0#Items_for_discussion

See also http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0/Sandbox#Additional_terms_framework.  We're thinking hard about an additional terms framework in the spirit of GPLv3, particularly for warranties and disclaimers.

Diane


On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Diane Peters <diane AT creativecommons.org> wrote:
On the porting question, please keep in mind that we are not discussing porting at this time.  We have a porting consultation period on our schedule (http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3) once we are further along in our process. 

Diane

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Francesco Poli <invernomuto AT paranoici.org> wrote:
Hi again,
Section 3(c)(1) of CC-by-nc-sa-v4.0draft1 states:

[...]
>     (1) You must release it under the terms of one of the following:
>
>       (i) this Public License,
>       (ii) a later version of this Public License containing the same
>       License Conditions, [or
>       (iii) a Creative Commons ported license (either this or a later
>       license version) containing the same License Conditions as this
>       Public License,]
>
>     (whichever license is chosen is the “Adaptation License”).
>
>         CC note: Alternative (iii) is bracketed in this draft because
>         the question of porting for 4.0 is undecided and will be
>         subject to discussion later in the 4.0 process.
[...]

I personally suggest to *not* port v4.0 licenses to specific jurisdictions.
I think the right approach is striving to create international licenses
that work well in as many jurisdictions as possible, without the need
of porting them to each local jurisdiction.

I also reiterate the recommendation to introduce explicit one-way
conversion clauses

 * that allow redistribution of CC-by-sa-v4.0-licensed works under the
  terms of the GNU GPL version 2 or any later version

 * that allow redistribution of CC-by-v4.0-licensed works under the
  terms of the zlib license: http://www.gzip.org/zlib/zlib_license.html

See my previous message [1] for more details.

[1] https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/cc-licenses/2011-December/006512.html

I hope these suggestions may be implemented in the next draft.


--
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
 New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82  3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE

_______________________________________________
List info and archives at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-licenses

In consideration of people subscribed to this list to participate
in the CC licenses http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0 development
process, please direct unrelated discussions to the cc-community list
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community








Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page