Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: [cc-licenses] is the cc-gpl text licensed?

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: adam hyde <adam AT xs4all.nl>
  • To: Dana Powers <dana.powers AT gmail.com>
  • Cc: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] is the cc-gpl text licensed?
  • Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 06:20:01 +0200

actually, I would rather not use the trademark, so it looks like all is
well.

Thanks!

adam



On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 15:59 -0700, Dana Powers wrote:
> CC does not assert copyright in the text of its licenses. However,
> you should review the trademark policy which may prohibit you from
> associating the Creative Commons' name with modified versions of the
> license.
>
> See http://creativecommons.org/policies/
>
> best,
> Dana
>
> On 7/16/07, adam hyde <adam AT xs4all.nl> wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > are the wrapper texts under:
> > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/GPL/2.0/
> >
> > licensed? I ask because I would like to take these templates and change
> > the wording so it is useful for applying to documentation.
> >
> > adam
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > adam hyde
> > 'free as in media'
> >
> > ~/.nl
> >
> > http://www.flossmanuals.net
> > http://www.simpel.cc
> > http://www.radioqualia.net
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cc-licenses mailing list
> > cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
> >
>
--


adam hyde
'free as in media'

~/.nl

http://www.flossmanuals.net
http://www.simpel.cc
http://www.radioqualia.net






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page