Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: Two Questions

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Gottfried Hofmann <toddd AT mypse.goracer.de>
  • To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: Two Questions
  • Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 20:12:19 +0200


Not exactly. The advertising clause sepcifically refers to advertising, see <http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/bsd.html>.


But it's very similiar.


Current wisdom is that BY is less obnoxious than original BSD. It's on a par with listing co-authors, which is basically what it requires.

Well, maybe it'S only less obnoxious for practical reasons. Images and music often don't have too many authors/contributors.
But when it comes to game development, CC-BY2.0 is at least as obnoxious as original BSD. The big difference: BSD was about advertising only while BY kicks in everywhere where authors are mentioned.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page