Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: what is freedom? was: Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Rob Myers <robmyers AT mac.com>
  • To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: what is freedom? was: Re: Why do you have to chose the "Attribution" option with the new CC 2.0 Licenses?
  • Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 10:34:09 +0100

On Monday, August 16, 2004, at 11:31PM, mp <mp AT fsc.cc> wrote:

>I am fascinated by the concept of "freedom"... in software the *most
>radical view* seems to be that:
>
>Freedom = the lifting of all constraints.

Lifting all constraints does not ensure freedom. That's why WINE relicensed
and why Microsoft are so happy with the BSD license they got their TCP stack
under.

>In the work of CC one would assume that the project was to translate the
>Freedom of Free Software *as a metaphor*, rather than literally
>transposing it unchanged/unchallenged to other domains. For what is Free
>exactly??

In software we have the FSF and the Debian definitions amongst others. IMHO
anarchist or """Libertarian""" ideas of freedom are less useful here than the
idea of a Free Society.

>- in the world of political theory the concept of lifting all
>constraints is one of the central elements of the global capital market
>forces, sometimes referred to as the laissez-faire aspect of
>neo-liberalism.

<tinfoil-hat>
Free trade is enforced by treaties, suppored by infrastructure created with
public money, and given disproportionate tax breaks. And if you don't want
free trade the World Bank will have something to say to you. Free Trade is
not free in the real world.
</tinfoil-hat>

>Human rights are constraints, as are the Ten
>Commandments.... Is the world ready for Full Freedom beyond software?

In a Free society our freedoms are maintained and protected by law. IMHO
freedom and lawlessness are not the same thing, indeed they are all but
opposites.

IMHO full Freedom sounds like lack of Rights, which isn't freedom. If I am
not free from harm, if I am not free to speak my mind, if I am not free to
move from place to place, I am not free.

>I doubt it. My freedom is bound up with yours and with everyone else's,
>-- and other parties' Freedom might well impinge upon your capacity to
>be *free*...

IMHO this is not Freedom, this is unconstrainedness or irresponsibility.

>For instance, the pursuit of profit for profit's sake alone
>through severe and devastating exploitation, such as exercised by oil
>companies etc., -is that something that can be embraced by (or within)
>Freedom? - can we be building freedom if our community includes such
>actors?

Any system can be gamed and exploited. If you are not Free to criticise this
or even to talk about it, it doesn't matter whether the entity is a state
monopoly or an oligarch's toy, exploitation will happen.

Boxing off commercial exploitation with the holy badge of NC takes nothing
back from the commercial entities that will profit from the creation and
distribution of the work regardless.

So IMHO :
1. NC stops anyone who uses the work from making money off of it.
2. The internet service providers, software and hardware companies, internet
hosts and print shops that are involved in the creation of the work still
make money off of it.
3. The warm glow of anti-capitalist virtue people get from NC is therefore
self-defreating. They are giving money to commercial interests without taking
anything back from them.

>[...]
>How much damage and greed and violence can Freedom sustain?

Free software udner the GPL is doing very well. The GPL ensures freedom.
Free software under BSD isn't doing so well, as the TCP and WINE people will
tell you. The BSD license provides stuff for free, it doesn't ensure freedom.

>Free Software in guided missiles, is that Freedom?

Yes. :-( It is freedom for software. Ensuring that one is free to object to
the missile's use, or that one is free from being on the receiving end of it,
are different freedoms.

- Rob.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page