Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-eyebeam - [cc-eyebeam] Re: why art shouldn't be property

cc-eyebeam AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Creative Commons-Eyebeam Forum 2003 November 12-19

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: marek_walczak AT yahoo.com
  • To: cc-eyebeam AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [cc-eyebeam] Re: why art shouldn't be property
  • Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 13:48:38 -0500 (EST)


> The answer, I think, is open licenses. By extending the noncommercial,
> sharealike, and open source requirements attached to such licenses we can
> envision a future in which an artist's legacy benefits people instead of
> benefiting institutions.

I'm totally lost. It seems like you've outlined one paradigm where artists
earn very little to another one where they earn nothing at all! In such a
context, can you explain where the money would come from?
Thanks.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page