Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - [b-hebrew] Akhenaten and Joseph: Linguistic Connections

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: JimStinehart AT aol.com
  • To: if AT math.bu.edu, nebarry AT verizon.net
  • Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [b-hebrew] Akhenaten and Joseph: Linguistic Connections
  • Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 15:58:20 -0400 (EDT)

Here is another possible linguistic connection between historical Akhenaten and Biblical Joseph.

 

The Canaanite/pre-Hebrew/Hebrew word for “arm” is used in describing both (i) Akhenaten in the Amarna Letters, and (ii) Joseph in the Patriarchal narratives.

 

We see the west Semitic gloss zu-ru-ux at Amarna Letter EA 287: 27 from Hurrian princeling IR-Heba of Jerusalem, where that word is used to describe Akhenaten.  Note that we see the  s-a-m-e  word (though in plural) at Genesis 49: 24, where the singular form in Hebrew is ZRW(, with that word there being used to describe Joseph.

 

It is important to note in this connection that cuneiform cannot distinguish one guttural from another.  Accordingly, the heth/X at the end of the Amarna Letter gloss may be an attempt to denote Canaanite ayin/(.  [Likewise, the last letter in the name of the high priest of Ra from On who is Joseph’s Egyptian father-in-law is ayin/( in the received alphabetical text.  But if the Patriarchal narratives are an ancient text that was originally recorded in cuneiform, then that final letter was Akkadian cuneiform heth/X, which can be any guttural, and it may likely have been actually intended to be Hebrew heth/X here, rather than Hebrew ayin/(.  So that Biblical name actually ends with RX [though the received alphabetical text has R(], which is rx in Egyptian, meaning “to know” in Egyptian.  As such, contra the scholarly view, the name “Potipherah” is a completely different name from “Potiphar”, with both such names exemplifying words and concepts from Akhenaten’s Great Hymn.  Similarly, the last letter in “Pharaoh”, which in the received alphabetical text is he/H, may actually have been intended in the cuneiform original to be heth/X, since cuneiform cannot distinguish those two gutturals.  If so, then “Pharaoh” is PR (X, which would represent the Egyptian words pA ra ax.  That would be directly comparable, once again, to the name “Akhenaten”, which is ax-n-itn, where itn = pA ra, that is, Aton = the Ra, in Akhenaten’s way of thinking.  PR (X : pA ra ax : “Spirit of God” : RWX )LHYM : ax-n-itn : “Akhenaten”.  They’re all slightly different ways of saying basically the same thing:  “Spirit of God”.  Thus the Egyptian-based Hebrew word “Pharaoh” may intentionally be a play on the name “Akhenaten”, further supporting the view that the Pharaoh being portrayed at the end of Genesis is Akhenaten.]

 

Returning now to the Canaanite/Hebrew word for “arm”, both in the above Amarna Letter and at Genesis 49: 24, the Canaanite word for “arm” is used in connection with describing the strength of a powerful monotheistic person in Egypt [Akhenaten/Joseph].  Please note that the  s-a-m-e  exact west Semitic word, ZRW(, is used in both sources to describe Joseph and Akhenaten.

 

And as previously noted, the name “Akhenaten” can be viewed as meaning “Spirit of God”, which is exactly how Joseph is described by Pharaoh at Genesis 41: 38.  Note that in all of these various cases, the  s-a-m-e  nomenclature is used to describe Akhenaten and Joseph, who are the two most famous early monotheists in Egypt.

 

Jim Stinehart

Evanston, Illinois




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page