Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] (MQ: "Deep Place"

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Alan Wood <salad_wood AT yahoo.com.au>
  • To: "b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] (MQ: "Deep Place"
  • Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 15:46:32 -0800 (PST)

Dear Jim,
As I understand it, you are saying:
·         A place called Hebron in Genesis is described using
(MQ.
·         The place called Hebron in Judges and Samuel is
described using (LH or HR.
·         Based on your reading, these descriptions are incompatible (i.e.
‘outside Genesis’, they are not used of the
same site).
·         Alter suggests that Genesis is wrong in its
description.
·         You postulate that Genesis is describing
a different place of a similar name.
·         This is important to you because it fits with
your wider thought on reading the patriarchal narratives.
It’s good that you want to have a conversation.  But you’re starting this
one, so you
need to tell others what it’s about. 
You actually put the question ‘Are Hebron and Hebron the
same Hebron?’ after 2,158 of the 3,388 words you’ve so far said on this
subject,
and only in your third post.  You were
clearly heading there all along, so it would have helped if you had asked it
up front - at the very least, at the
end of the first post (after your first 930 words).  It’s a lot easier to
have a conversation if
you get to the point sooner.
 
By the way, you have left open some rhetorical holes, if not
logical ones.  I haven't looked where you've looked, so I don’t know if
Genesis
routinely uses geographical descriptors differently from the rest of the
Tanakh,
or from the rest of the Torah itself.  If it does, that
would account for your data as well as Alter’s explanation or yours does. 
You have said “*leaving Genesis aside for a moment*,
there is not a single place that the Bible describes as being both (MQ and
either (LH or HR.”  That makes me wonder,
where else does (MQ appear in odd ways in
Genesis?  What other geographical
descriptors are used strangely in Genesis?
Alan Wood
>From fred.putnam AT gmail.com Thu Jan 5 21:19:26 2012
Return-Path: <fred.putnam AT gmail.com>
X-Original-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix, from userid 20217)
id A6E3FE8E07; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 21:19:26 -0500 (EST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
mailman1.ibiblio.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham
version=3.3.1
Received: from mail-pw0-f49.google.com (mail-pw0-f49.google.com
[209.85.160.49])
by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B090DE8CD4
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 21:19:25 -0500
(EST)
Received: by pbaa11 with SMTP id a11so891566pba.36
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:19:25 -0800
(PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.74.10 with SMTP id p10mr11015690pbv.3.1325816365084; Thu,
05 Jan 2012 18:19:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.41.137 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 18:19:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:
<CACfeyrkUCxsA01mUpu-xRra8j0xbzGPDFqTDPXas3DdWXY1HkA AT mail.gmail.com>
References:
<CACfeyrkUCxsA01mUpu-xRra8j0xbzGPDFqTDPXas3DdWXY1HkA AT mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 21:19:25 -0500
Message-ID:
<CAK01YYO_pXE8jB4n-Bgov0AP=9i6HMYXY0qpixx6sV0d8zcbgQ AT mail.gmail.com>
From: fred putnam <fred.putnam AT gmail.com>
To: Kirk Lowery <empirical.humanist AT gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.9
Cc: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] END OF THREAD Blau - Phonology and Morphology...
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Biblical Hebrew Forum <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 02:19:26 -0000

Thank you, Kirk.

Fred Putnam

On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Kirk Lowery
<empirical.humanist AT gmail.com>wrote:

> Friends,
>
> We've reached an impasse here discussing Blau in general terms. In order
> to go forward, please cite Blau (pro and con) in specific statements or
> assertions that he makes -- in a new thread.
>
> Or don't discuss Blau. :-)
>
> Blessings,
>
> Kirk
> B-Hebrew co-moderator
> --
> Kirk E. Lowery, PhD
> President & Senior Research Fellow
> The J. Alan Groves Center for Advanced Biblical Research
> --
> $DO || ! $DO ; try
> try: command not found
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>



--
--)---------------
"We are not yet what we already are" (J. Pieper).

Frederic Clarke Putnam, Ph.D. | Professor of Biblical Studies
Philadelphia Biblical University | 200 Manor Avenue | Langhorne, PA
19047-2990
http://pbu.edu | 1215-702-4502 | Fax: 1-215-702-4533 | www.fredputnam.org

 Before printing this email, think green!




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page