Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - RE: [b-hebrew] Does the Dead Sea Scroll, 4QDeut q, match the LXX Quotation of Deuteronomy 32:43?

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Philip Engmann" <phil-eng AT ighmail.com>
  • To: 'Søren Holst' <sh AT teol.ku.dk>, "'b-hebrew'" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: RE: [b-hebrew] Does the Dead Sea Scroll, 4QDeut q, match the LXX Quotation of Deuteronomy 32:43?
  • Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 06:48:31 -0000

"wehishtachawu lo (kol) 'elohim" (thus 4QDeut[j]).

Søren,
Should this not be 4QDeut[q]?[1]

-----Original Message-----
From: b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Søren Holst
Sent: 01 March 2004 14:59
To: b-hebrew
Subject: [b-hebrew] Does the Dead Sea Scroll, 4QDeut q,match the LXX
Quotation of Deuteronomy 32:43?


No other biblical Qumran text seems to preserve Deut 32,43, nor does it
(going by Dave Washburn's index) seem to be quoted in any nonbiblical
text.

The BHS lumps together LXX, Qumran and the epistle to the Hebrews in one
note, saying that these sources add the equivalent of "wehishtachawu lo
(kol) 'elohim" (thus 4QDeut[j]) or "... beney 'el" (thus LXX and,
changing "huioi" to "angelloi", also Hebrews)


Soren, Copenhagen

__________________________________

_____

[1] This is just for clarification.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page