Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - RE: bereshit

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Paul Zellmer" <pzellmer AT sc.rr.com>
  • To: "Biblical Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu>
  • Subject: RE: bereshit
  • Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 15:23:09 -0500


As I looked it over, I realized that my comment on 20:5 was not clear. The
point I was making is that the last three clauses are not part of a complex
unit. They simply describe actions that took place during the choosing of
Israel.

Paul Zellmer

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Zellmer [mailto:pzellmer AT sc.rr.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 2:33 PM
> To: Biblical Hebrew
> Subject: RE: bereshit
>
>
> Ian,
>
> In the Ezek 20:5 passage, the last three clauses are not controlled at all
> by the first. They are describing how Israel was chosen.
>
> In the Ezek 24:25 passage, you are dealing with a complex
> definite object of
> a single clause. How does that show complex subordination?
>
> Paul Zellmer
>
>
>
> Ian wrote:
>
> > Whoops. Too much in a hurry. Try, with the same aim,
> > ie to show the government of complex subordination:
> >
> > Eze 20:5
> > bywm bxry by$r'l
> > w'$' ydy lzr` byt y`qb
> > w'wd` lhm b'rc mcrym
> > w'$' ydy lhm l'mr 'ny yhwh 'lhykm
> >
> > Eze 24:25
> > bywm qxty mhm 't-m`wzm m$w$ tp'rtm
> > 't mxmd `ynyhm
> > w't-m$h np$m bnyhm wbnwtyhm
> >
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: [pzellmer AT sc.rr.com]
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to
> $subst('Email.Unsub')
> To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu.
>
>





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page