Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: 2 Ki 2:23-24

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Daniel Wagner" <dan.wagner AT netzero.net>
  • To: "Biblical Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: 2 Ki 2:23-24
  • Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 18:26:53 -0400


----- Original Message -----
From: Shoshanna Walker <rosewalk AT concentric.net>
To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: 2 Ki 2:23-24


> No, I am claiming that G-d wrote it,

I agree.

> not ancient writers,

Based on Ex. 17:14; 34:27; & Deut. 31:24, i can't agree with your dichotemy.

> that the Torah is
> much more than a literary work,

I agree. It's much *more* than mere literature, but a divine revelation does
not exclude a literary character. Deuteronomy is in the form of a suzerain's
covenant treaty common to Moses' day, for example. The literary structure
thus emphasizes the message of the book.

God used common human literary forms and structures, as well as common human
grammar and vocabulary, as part of the vehicle whereby He communicated His
truth to man. What problem do you have with this concept?

> and that every single letter is there for a
> reason, and that the reason is not for variety.

I possibly agree, in theory, since i believe God's providence is extended to
all things, including each letter you and i may be writing in these e-mails.
But what do you do with the many places where the letters are different in
different extant MSS? How do you select the original spelling and identify
the devious (variant) spelling(s)? Is God still giving out the information to
you concerning which variant is the correct one today -- or must it be
induced scientifically (by textual criticism)?

Dan Wagner

>
> Shoshanna
>
>
>
> Shoshanna,
>
> Are you claiming that ancient BH writer(s) were incapable of free variation?
> Is that a uniquely modern literary discovery? Is it not a acceptable
> "reason" to use a particular word for literary/stylistic purposes alone?
>
> (I am not intending to argue for free variation in this particular context
> necessarily, but asking the larger question of whether it is possible in
> general.)
>
> Dan Wagner
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Shoshanna Walker <rosewalk AT concentric.net>
> To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 12:25 PM
> Subject: Re: 2 Ki 2:23-24
>
>
> >
> > In the Torah, every single word is there for a reason, even some words are
> > missing letters, etc. - it is all very precise.
> >
> > You can't really have a full understanding by just brushing it off as
> > "variety"
> >
> > Rashi says that his voice was that of a youth.
> >
> > I don't have all the commentators in front of me, nor would I be able to
> > understand them all, but they do address this.
> >
> > Shoshanna
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: [rosewalk AT concentric.net]
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to
> $subst('Email.Unsub')
> To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: [dan.wagner AT netzero.net]
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to $subst('Email.Unsub')
> To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu.
>
>


NetZero Platinum
No Banner Ads and Unlimited Access
Sign Up Today - Only $9.95 per month!
http://www.netzero.net




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page