Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

acawiki-general - [acawiki-general] Fwd: [Wiki-research-l] New version of Wikipedia review.

acawiki-general AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Acawiki-general mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Jodi Schneider <jschneider AT pobox.com>
  • To: "AcaWiki general (listserv)" <acawiki-general AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Cc: Finn Aarup Nielsen <fn AT imm.dtu.dk>
  • Subject: [acawiki-general] Fwd: [Wiki-research-l] New version of Wikipedia review.
  • Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:46:02 +0100

Brede wiki [1] will contribute summaries to AcaWiki! Finn is willing to extract all the structured data to a database; the
body text will still need to be dealt with.

Yeah for more neuroscience summaries!

Anybody want to do the import? 

-Jodi
[1] http://neuro.imm.dtu.dk/wiki/Main_Page

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Finn Årup Nielsen <fn AT imm.dtu.dk>
Date: 2011/6/22
Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] New version of Wikipedia review.
To: "jschneider AT pobox.com" <jschneider AT pobox.com>


Hi Jodi,


ons, 22 06 2011 kl. 00:51 +0200, skrev Jodi Schneider:

> Do you know who to contact on the Brede wiki about licensing for the
> summaries?

Ha! That is a really funny question. I am practically Brede Wiki. I am
sorry that is not clear from the Brede Wiki description. :-)


> I think it would be really cool to add summaries to AcaWiki, if Brede
> wiki folks would agree:
> http://acawiki.org/

You are indeed welcome to add summaries to AcaWiki.

The only issue would be that the Brede Wiki is distributed with
share-alike while Acawiki is not-necessarily share-alike. As practically
all summaries are written by me I can easily put it under CC-by. Maybe I
should change the default license? Have you given any thought as to why
you selected CC-by and not CC-by-sa? I suppose CC-by is practically the
standard among researchers, while CC-by-sa stems from Wikimedia
Foundation inspired projects.

Note that I can extract all the structured data to a database (not the
body text though) which will/should make it much easier for you to
include the data in your wiki.


All the best
Finn


> -Jodi
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Finn Aarup Nielsen <fn AT imm.dtu.dk>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>         While awaiting the Okoli-review I have updated my
>         Wikipedia/wiki review
>         with a few extra pages and references:
>
>         http://www2.imm.dtu.dk/pubdb/views/edoc_download.php/6012/pdf/imm6012.pdf
>
>         I've also added some hyperlinks.
>
>
>
>         Of further interest to Wikipedia researchers may also be the
>         'Wikipedia'
>         page on the Brede Wiki which has links to researchers, tools
>         and papers:
>
>         http://neuro.imm.dtu.dk/wiki/Wikipedia
>
>         Please feel free to edit.
>
>
>
>         /Finn
>
>         ___________________________________________________________________
>
>                  Finn Aarup Nielsen, DTU Informatics, Denmark
>          Lundbeck Foundation Center for Integrated Molecular Brain
>         Imaging
>            http://www.imm.dtu.dk/~fn/
>          http://nru.dk/staff/fnielsen/
>         ___________________________________________________________________
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Wiki-research-l mailing list
>         Wiki-research-l AT lists.wikimedia.org
>         https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
>

--
Finn Årup Nielsen <fn AT imm.dtu.dk>
Technical University of Denmark




  • [acawiki-general] Fwd: [Wiki-research-l] New version of Wikipedia review., Jodi Schneider, 06/23/2011

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page