[SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?

Eric Sandall eric at sandall.us
Tue Apr 6 18:57:36 EDT 2010


Quoting Jeremy Blosser <jblosser-smgl at firinn.org>:

> Geeze you guys did a half dozen emails just while I was trying to reply
> once.
>
> On Apr 06, Eric Sandall [eric at sandall.us] wrote:
>> Quoting flux <flux at sourcemage.org>:
>> I would prefer to have anyone with control of our resources as part of
>> our project, whether they be a Lead Developer, a Systems
>> Administrator, or our Public Relations officer.
>
> Depending on your definitions this is not generally possible; while we have
> on purpose built our primary infrastructure on hardware the project
> controls, we don't have funds to do most day-to-day hosting there, so it
> only serves as the mirror master and only becomes primary when other things
> fail.  Those other things are maintained external to the project and have
> plenty of in control people that may or may not be SMGL people.  ibilio for
> one, DBG for another.

I don't consider those properly part of our project, more replications  
of our project.

>> We'll need an Issue Vote to change
>> http://www.sourcemage.org/SourceMage/Developer_Organization.
>
> Like David I'd really encourage more discussion before trying to vote on
> something, two people talking is quickly an echo chamber.  I oppose further
> splitting the classes of people up, just make a component inline with what
> we already have and KISS.

We could instead remove the commit quota and change it to something  
more appropriate for all members.

-sandalle

-- 
Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric at sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/          |  http://counter.li.org/  #196285



More information about the SM-Discuss mailing list