[SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?
eric at sandall.us
Tue Apr 6 18:57:36 EDT 2010
Quoting Jeremy Blosser <jblosser-smgl at firinn.org>:
> Geeze you guys did a half dozen emails just while I was trying to reply
> On Apr 06, Eric Sandall [eric at sandall.us] wrote:
>> Quoting flux <flux at sourcemage.org>:
>> I would prefer to have anyone with control of our resources as part of
>> our project, whether they be a Lead Developer, a Systems
>> Administrator, or our Public Relations officer.
> Depending on your definitions this is not generally possible; while we have
> on purpose built our primary infrastructure on hardware the project
> controls, we don't have funds to do most day-to-day hosting there, so it
> only serves as the mirror master and only becomes primary when other things
> fail. Those other things are maintained external to the project and have
> plenty of in control people that may or may not be SMGL people. ibilio for
> one, DBG for another.
I don't consider those properly part of our project, more replications
of our project.
>> We'll need an Issue Vote to change
> Like David I'd really encourage more discussion before trying to vote on
> something, two people talking is quickly an echo chamber. I oppose further
> splitting the classes of people up, just make a component inline with what
> we already have and KISS.
We could instead remove the commit quota and change it to something
more appropriate for all members.
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric at sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | http://counter.li.org/ #196285
More information about the SM-Discuss