[SM-Discuss] alternative grimoire layout
Andrew
afrayedknot at thefrayedknot.armory.com
Tue Apr 5 16:24:28 EDT 2005
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 02:03:47PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
> On Apr 05, Andrew [afrayedknot at thefrayedknot.armory.com] wrote:
> > [snip another proposal]
>
> Heh, so we basically have 3 approaches to this (not surprising) :
>
> 1. one based on a new user perspective (because I am still a new user and
> I'm pretty sure I'm mostly asking for what I'm looking for as a new user)
>
> 2. one based on the (legitimate) needs of the spell maintainers
>
> 3. one based on the (legitimate) needs of the sorcery system maintainers
To be clear I wasnt saying may organizational strategy was for the
needs of sorcery, sorcery doesnt care at all what sections things go
in, but spells by their nature inherit from sections in a natural way,
I was just trying to bring that point to the surface.
I dont necesarily see 2 and 3 as distinct categories given my explaination
above and sorcery's stance on sections, if people want to forego give up
the inheritence advantages by organizing sections in a way that doesnt
lend itself thats fine. My point is just that we can simultaneously have
a grimoire layout that utilizes section inheritence, which also in some
cases makes life easier on developers, and have symlinked layouts that
suit the user/developers needs while using file system level commands.
So, yes, my explaination (to me at least) would be sane for all '3' goals.
>
> Is there a sane way to provide for the needs of all 3?
>
> > Now, respond with why that idea sucks and lets continue talking about this
> > for another few weeks until we eventually all get tired and do nothing,
> > ready? go!
>
> Yeah, that's pretty much what I expect too. So let's keep in mind that at
> some point we have to do *something*; this all started around the question
> of getting some maintainers for the spells in the utils section, and that's
> not solving itself while we debate.
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
--
__________________________________________________________________________
|Andrew D. Stitt | astitt at sourcemage.org |
|irc: afrayedknot | afrayedknot at t.armory.com |
|aim: thefrayedknot or iteratorplusplus | acedit at armory.com |
|Sorcery Team Lead | ftp://t.armory.com/ |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20050405/f3fb2d26/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss
mailing list